Breaking news
Huawei founder says firm does not spy for China -
Vegan activist ‘tackled’ by police -
Grave fears held for missing teen -
Inside the US Navy’s ship of shame -
Kenya terror attack: Who are al Shabaab? -
Filppula's OT goal lifts surging Islanders past Blues 2-1 -
Booker returns but Suns routed by Pacers -
Rare Singapore Hotel site gets record US$415m bid -
India's Ishan set for new football journey with Nastic -

News Analysis: Before Trump Insisted on His Wall, Border Security Was an Issue That Could Be Discussed

News Analysis: Before Trump Insisted on His Wall, Border Security Was an Issue That Could Be Discussed
News Analysis: Before Trump Insisted on His Wall, Border Security Was an Issue That Could Be Discussed

It has all left veterans of past border debates exasperated and frustrated.

“We know how to secure borders,” said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist who was a top aide to Senator Marco Rubio in 2013 when the Republican senator from Florida helped lead the major, bipartisan effort to overhaul immigration. “The 2013 immigration plan had what everybody agreed was the most effective way possible to secure borders and other points of entry.”

With the backing of President Barack Obama, a bipartisan group of eight senators that year succeeded in passing a comprehensive overhaul of the nation’s immigration system. But the legislation, which passed with 68 votes, prompted fierce opposition from conservative Republicans, who condemned it as amnesty for 11 million undocumented immigrants. It was never brought up for a vote in the House.

Still, the Senate legislation was an indication of where the two parties could agree on border security. It doubled the number of Border Patrol agents, from 19,000 to almost 40,000, an increase that even the authors of the proposal agreed was overkill but was designed mostly as an enticement to win Republican support.

Senators from both parties also agreed on money for technological improvements along the border. The bill allocated $3.2 billion for drones, infrared ground sensors and long-range thermal imaging cameras to give Border Patrol agents advance notice when migrants cross illegally, especially at night. It also included money for an electronic employment verification system for all employers and upgrades at airports to catch immigrants who overstay their visas.

And the consensus included some physical barriers — what Mr. Trump might call walls and others would call fencing. Years earlier, the Secure Fence Act of 2006 allocated money to build about 650 miles of barriers along the border. The 2013 bill, had it been signed into law, would have increased that total to almost 700 miles, mostly along the eastern half of the border with Mexico.

Almost all of the fencing that Congress has approved has already been built. In populated areas, the fence is tall and steel or chain-link and designed to keep people out. In other places, the barrier is nothing more than short, metal poles spaced out to keep vehicles from driving through, or low, wooden fences that run alongside pedestrian paths.

In 2011, a Government Accountability Office report concluded that despite 649 miles of completed fencing, the “the southwest border continues to be vulnerable to cross-border illegal activity, including the smuggling of humans and illegal narcotics.”

Dear Visitor you already read News Analysis: Before Trump Insisted on His Wall, Border Security Was an Issue That Could Be Discussed in our website shamelnews and it has been published this article New York Times and it is originally related to the original publisher of this article and you can Visit the source of this article by clicking this link New York Times

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox

Follow us on social media networks

PREV Former kidnap victim Elizabeth Smart offers advice to Jayme Closs
NEXT Apple iPhone chip supplier Dialog reports revenue results at low end of expected range